🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam decision, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to implement a newly configured congressional district plan that is projected to include up to five additional Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 order, handed down on Thursday, grants a request by the state to overturn a lower court's injunction that had invalidated the new map in November.

Court's Explanation

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, generating much confusion and disturbing the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in justifying its ruling.

The federal court had determined that Texas had likely classified voters according to their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it passed the boundaries. It had ordered the state to revert to the boundaries established after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissenting Opinion

Through a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's action. She argued that it undermined the work of the lower court, noting that its decision was actually authored by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan stated in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, The majority's order ensures that Texas's new map, with all its boosted favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced repeatedly, is a infraction of the law of the land.

Countrywide Redistricting Fight

The court's action is part of a countrywide battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican majority. Typically, redistricting happens after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that might create a number of additional conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have responded with new maps in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Political Responses

The Texas attorney general welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures representation aligned with the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he remarked.

On the other hand, Democratic leaders decried the ruling. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the leader of a major party campaign committee.

A senior House leader stated the court had once again shredded its credibility by upholding a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he concluded.