🔗 Share this article

Around the globe, nations are pouring hundreds of billions into the concept of “sovereign AI” – developing domestic machine learning systems. From the city-state of Singapore to Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, states are vying to develop AI that grasps regional dialects and cultural nuances.

The Worldwide AI Battle

This trend is a component of a broader global competition led by major corporations from the America and the People's Republic of China. While organizations like OpenAI and Meta allocate massive funds, middle powers are likewise taking independent investments in the AI landscape.

But amid such huge investments at stake, can smaller nations attain meaningful gains? As noted by a specialist from a well-known thinktank, “Unless you’re a wealthy nation or a large corporation, it’s quite a burden to develop an LLM from scratch.”

Defence Considerations

A lot of nations are hesitant to use overseas AI systems. Across India, as an example, US-built AI systems have at times fallen short. One example saw an AI assistant used to instruct pupils in a remote area – it communicated in English with a strong Western inflection that was nearly-incomprehensible for native users.

Additionally there’s the defence aspect. For the Indian military authorities, using specific external systems is considered unacceptable. As one founder commented, It's possible it contains some random learning material that could claim that, such as, Ladakh is not part of India … Using that certain AI in a security environment is a major risk.”

He further stated, “I have spoken to experts who are in the military. They want to use AI, but, setting aside specific systems, they prefer not to rely on Western systems because information might go overseas, and that is absolutely not OK with them.”

National Projects

Consequently, a number of nations are backing domestic ventures. One such a effort is in progress in the Indian market, where a firm is working to create a domestic LLM with public funding. This effort has committed approximately 1.25 billion dollars to machine learning progress.

The developer envisions a AI that is significantly smaller than top-tier models from Western and Eastern tech companies. He states that India will have to make up for the funding gap with talent. Located in India, we lack the option of pouring huge sums into it,” he says. “How do we vie against say the $100 or $300 or $500bn that the United States is investing? I think that is the point at which the fundamental knowledge and the intellectual challenge comes in.”

Native Focus

Across Singapore, a state-backed program is supporting machine learning tools trained in local regional languages. These particular dialects – for example Malay, Thai, the Lao language, Bahasa Indonesia, Khmer and more – are frequently inadequately covered in Western-developed LLMs.

It is my desire that the people who are building these independent AI models were informed of how rapidly and just how fast the frontier is progressing.

A leader engaged in the initiative explains that these tools are created to supplement larger AI, as opposed to replacing them. Tools such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he says, frequently struggle with native tongues and local customs – speaking in unnatural Khmer, for instance, or suggesting pork-based recipes to Malay consumers.

Developing local-language LLMs permits state agencies to include cultural nuance – and at least be “smart consumers” of a advanced tool created in other countries.

He adds, “I’m very careful with the word independent. I think what we’re aiming to convey is we aim to be better represented and we wish to understand the capabilities” of AI technologies.

Multinational Cooperation

Regarding states seeking to find their place in an escalating worldwide landscape, there’s a different approach: team up. Researchers affiliated with a respected institution put forward a government-backed AI initiative allocated across a alliance of emerging states.

They refer to the project “an AI equivalent of Airbus”, drawing inspiration from the European productive initiative to build a alternative to a major aerospace firm in the mid-20th century. This idea would involve the creation of a government-supported AI organization that would pool the assets of various nations’ AI initiatives – including the UK, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, Germany, the nation of Japan, the Republic of Singapore, South Korea, the French Republic, Switzerland and the Kingdom of Sweden – to establish a viable alternative to the Western and Eastern leaders.

The main proponent of a study setting out the initiative says that the concept has gained the interest of AI leaders of at least three countries to date, as well as multiple national AI companies. Although it is presently targeting “middle powers”, developing countries – Mongolia and Rwanda among them – have also shown curiosity.

He comments, “Nowadays, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s less trust in the assurances of the existing White House. Experts are questioning like, is it safe to rely on these technologies? What if they opt to